Take Them Up, Take Them Down, Take Them All Around (We All End Up In The Same Place)

[ad_1]

Take Them Up, Take Them Down, Take Them All Around (We All End Up In The Same Place)

Enlightenment is someplace we all end up ultimately. We all take different roads to it though. Some long, some short, some bumpy, some smooth, some interesting and some boring. Indeed, though, we all end up in the same place ultimately. Utopia may mean "no place perfectly" in the Greek and Latin language, but I know what we are all striving for and I can tell you a little bit about it: We are all striving to genuinely win consistently like a "casino house that never really loses". I know that sounds like a blanket statement and a little too general. Ultimately, though, nobody really wants to die broke, even "the worst of losers" wants to ultimately come out "break-even" or "above the line a little bit" and genuine winners do not want to lose. It is a psychological and spiritual reality, and honest truth about reality: Who really wants to lose? Nobody does.

Even masochistic and self-destructive people want fulfillment and winning in their own screwed up ways. Even "dyed in the wool" genuine winners want to win forever without it ending. When the cause of it all is genuinely and solely considered seriously instead of just looking at effects, it is possible. I mean, God or good is the ultimate cause and the devil or evil is the ultimate effect. So, I am saying that when you count causes seriously, and effects as secondary to the cause, a whole new world opens that has the genuine possibility of genuine and permanent winning. When effects are considered as important as causes, that is when losing really does happen deeply. Think about that seriously, do not take my word for it. I gave that fact a lot of thought myself, and it is a logical conclusion I have come to in life: When you fix the cause, and the genuine ultimate cause, effects will ultimately and always be good. When you solely consider effects, nothing will work.

I think of this metaphor, say you have an automobile that works well from its inception: It was built with love, it works well and has a loving owner that drives it well and takes care of it. Okay, no problem. But here is a negative effect that could be avoided if done right: Say that well-running car runs out of gas, and cannot run and stops on a freeway. I know, that is an extreme example of effect, but it illustrates my point. Fill the car with gas as a cause as well as be a good owner of the vehicle and it will work well as an effect. The cause is all of the above right down to good driving and good care.

See my point: consider causes squarely, honestly and realistically and you will have good and great effects and not bad ones. Cause and effect, whatever the path may be is where the straight line without shock always happen when the cause is considered first, honestly and foremost, and the effect is considered secondary.

[ad_2]

Source by Joshua Clayton